On 28 June 2016 at 20:37, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2016, at 16:54, Ted Lemon wrote: > > Unfortunately the updates to adpkja do not address the serious problems in >> the document that led to me writing a replacement. >> > > Could you list those? In Buenos Aires, the major problem was "lack of > focus" and "organization", and it feels like both of those have been well > addressed in the past few drafts since the meeting. > > Warren and I are working >> on an update to the tldr document. >> > > Good, but should that prevent the WG from adopting > draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem? If so, why? Forgive my ignorance of the process, but wouldn't adopting draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem as "*the* problem statement" (my stress) preclude adopting the tldr document? > > > --Paul Hoffman > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
