On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 Jul 2016, at 13:52, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > >> Forgive my ignorance of the process, but wouldn't adopting >> draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem as "*the* problem statement" (my >> stress) preclude adopting the tldr document? > > > That was my intention, yes. The authors of the "tldr" draft seemed to have > abandoned it while the authors of special-names-problem were actively > maintaining and (in my opinion) improving theirs. After I started this > thread, the "tldr" folks came out with a new version of their draft and > asked the WG to consider it as well.
Actually, the tldr authors hadn't hadn't abandoned it - they / we were simply waiting to post a new version so that I could chat with the authors of draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem to let them know that I would be co-authoring tldr. I chatted with Alain on 6/22 and then Peter Koch on 6/26 when I arrived in Helsinki for the ICANN meeting. Ted and I discussed how to improve the tldr document in early June, and then posted an intermediate version to github on June 17th - https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-tldr-sutld-ps/commits/master . Anyway, the dates are not important; I want to clarify that the tldr document had not been abandoned, nor was only being updated in response to the other document. W > > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
