On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:59:42PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > But it's certainly another step along the way to DNSbis by accident.
> 
> Would it be useful to make it not "by accident"?

Yes.  That was basically the point I was trying to make at the
beginning of today's session, about overall analysis. 

 > b) make this draft DNS-SD only, so it can fast forward...
>

I'm not keen on this.


> c) use the changed paradigm to work on DNSbis without the accident part?

I'm starting to wonder whether a bof is needed.  Maybe the IAB's
workshop will produce some fruit?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to