> On 2 Feb 2018, at 7:56 am, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > On 1 Feb 2018, at 12:20, Geoff Huston wrote: > >> What about if the sentinel spec proposes to use a left-most label of the >> form(s): >> >> xm—-is-ta-[key] >> >> and >> >> xm—-not-ta-[key] >> >> >> would this form of hostname be a reasonable way forward? > > This was discussed in a different thread in the WG a few days ago, and a few > of us had objections and alternate proposals.
I’ve reviewed the (lengthening) thread on this draft, but while I saw posted objections to the use of “xm—" as the initial part of the left-most label here, I did not see any concrete alternate proposals. So on the assumption that I must’ve missed these, could you please resend/remind me of such proposals so that we can use one that we are happy with, and I’ll update the draft accordingly. thanks, Geoff _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
