> On 20 Sep 2018, at 07:13, Mukund Sivaraman <m...@mukund.org> wrote: > > I don't follow how ANAME, if resolvers have to implement it, can be > deployed within a few years,
Resolvers don’t “have to” implement it: resolver support is just an optimisation that helps when the target is on a CDN. ANAME is mostly just a provisioning side hack to automatically keep address records up-to-date, so it can be deployed unilaterally and it will “just work” with existing software. The other options we have been discussing require a forklift upgrade before they can be relied on, and until that is complete they offer no advantage to zone publishers. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
