I agree. We're not trying to boil the DoH Oceans. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:42 PM Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> > > On 05/11/2018 12:51, Brian Dickson wrote: > > > It's a lot better than ANAME, and I think we do a disservice to > > ourselves as a DNS community, if we do anything other than put our > > collective support into it, preferably unanimously. > > Thank for you the support! > > > I see getting http adopted and deployed, and fixing the single major > > web-specific deficiency in DNS, as critical to attempting to head off > > DoH, which is the biggest bugbear at the moment. > > But please, let's not get into that argument. The only way to stave off > adding complexity in the DNS to fix the CNAME at apex problem is with > the cooperation of the browser vendors (and as Tim notes, the major > authoritative operators). We need their help, just like they need ours. > > Ray > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
