On Nov 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please keep RR type name as one lexical unit!
> 
> Constructing the name from multiple tokens ("SVCB" "-" "HTTPS") will trigger 
> all sorts of bugs all over the place. For example the venerable dnspython.org 
> library would require rework before it would be able to support the new type 
> named "SVCB-HTTPS".
> 
> What about SVCBWEB or WEBSVCB?
> 
> Or shorter SVC + WEBSVC?

I think it’s good to keep the protocol in the name, but agree with the syntax 
issue.  Given that http is dead, why not just HTTPSVC or HTTPSVCB?  There’s 
never going to be a competing no-TLS version of the RRtype.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to