On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:32 AM Erik Nygren <[email protected]> wrote:
> Some of my current leanings: > > SVCB and HTTPB (SVCB and HTTPSB) > > Of even shorter: "SB" and "HSB" > > (I also prefer SVCHTTPS over HTTPSSVC as the latter is way too easy to > leave out one of the S's.) > > I'd considered just calling "SVCB" as "B" but that makes it harder to > search for. > This is also why "HTTP" or "HTTPS" are dispreferred is that they are hard > to search for. > > HTTP(S) is more than just the Web which is why I'd be disinclined to use > WEB in the name. > > Erik > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:39 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello DNSOP, >> >> In the interest of getting this spec ready to go, I want to start our >> bikeshed on the RRTYPE name. We need a stable name that we all can live >> with. >> >> I'll start. Please chime in! >> >> Since it seems that many people like SVCB, and many don't like HTTPSSVC >> (too many repeated SS's!), I suggest using: >> >> SVCB (referred to as "Service Binding") >> >> SVCB-HTTPS (referred to as"Service Binding for HTTPS") >> >> >> Best, >> Tommy >> > Perhaps: SVCB and SVCH ? -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
