On 19. 11. 19 11:52, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Nov 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote: >> Please keep RR type name as one lexical unit! >> >> Constructing the name from multiple tokens ("SVCB" "-" "HTTPS") will trigger >> all sorts of bugs all over the place. For example the venerable >> dnspython.org library would require rework before it would be able to >> support the new type named "SVCB-HTTPS". >> >> What about SVCBWEB or WEBSVCB? >> >> Or shorter SVC + WEBSVC? > > I think it’s good to keep the protocol in the name, but agree with the syntax > issue. Given that http is dead, why not just HTTPSVC or HTTPSVCB? There’s > never going to be a competing no-TLS version of the RRtype.
Oh wait, why don't we get just "HTTP" for the protocol-specific variant? With generic key=value format it should be able to accomodate new stuff for future versions of HTTP... -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
