On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:39 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly= [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello DNSOP, > > In the interest of getting this spec ready to go, I want to start our > bikeshed on the RRTYPE name. We need a stable name that we all can live > with. > > I'll start. Please chime in! > > Since it seems that many people like SVCB, and many don't like HTTPSSVC > (too many repeated SS's!), I suggest using: > > SVCB (referred to as "Service Binding") > > SVCB-HTTPS (referred to as"Service Binding for HTTPS") > > "Binding" might be too confusing even if it is technically correct. It also might be too strong for the 0 case (alias form). Maybe REF instead of SVCB? I'm not concerned with any lexical sorting issues, just keep it to one token for parsing. Since it's for HTTP(S), how about HREF ? (Yes, that is a deliberate double entendre.) Brian
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
