On Aug 3, 2022, at 12:36 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin <mschanzenb...@posteo.de> wrote: > > Having now read further I am pretty convinced that the advisory is not useful > in the context of this thread discussion. > Ist sais at the end that [1] was the "impetus" for the advisory.
Reading a five-year old version of a draft is not a good way to determine the current state of thinking. You should only be looking at the current version of the WG document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
