Hiya,
On 18/08/2022 20:26, Paul Vixie wrote:
i don't think the .ALT draft is going to move forward without such change, so the distinction will be between .ALT as proposed and .ALT as evolved, not between .ALT and some other SUDN.
I think I agree. But to check: are we saying that the .alt I-D ought be changed (possibly outside dnsop) so that there's an IANA registry for one level of name beneath .alt with "RFC required" as the requirement for adding an entry? (So those RFCs could come from the IETF, IRTF, ISE etc. at present.) Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
