On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Aug 18, 2022, at 18:30, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
It appears that Eliot Lear <[email protected]>
It seems to me that the key word here is "cooperating." Considering
how many projects squat on various bits of the DNS name space, we have
seen only one show any interest in the RFC route
This is incorrect. A nunber of them got together to do them bundled in one RFC
and were told to split it up. At least two of them did.
You're right but it's still a tiny handful of all of the alt roots and
namecoins and all the other stuff that is supposed to make the DNS
obsolete.
That's why we need to make it as easy as possible to tell people what
name you're using, i.e., FCFS allowing duplicates.
Can you explain the difference between the first come and the second come ? If
there is no difference, it’s not FCFS. If there is a difference, it’s not
really a duplicate.
I could have been clearer. The names can be duplicates, not the rest of
the entry. So someone comes along and registers web.alt with a pointer to
her thing, then someone else comes along with a different thing but also
calls it web.alt, and we another entry in the registry.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
