If we need a boring self-explanatory name, I would be happy to go back to dnsext...
Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) [email protected] A gentle nudge is always appreciated if I take a little longer to reply. > On 6. 10. 2026, at 15:18, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Congratulations on doing the split that had been needed since dnsext closed > decades ago! > > >> On Oct 6, 2026, at 09:04, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> my humble proposal for the name of the new INT WG DNS group is... >> >> CAMEL - Continued Amendment and Maintenance of Essential Lookups > > Cute ! > > But more seriously, names should be meaningful and where possible self > explanatory- especially to help new participants, so something as boring as > dnsdev would be much better even if it’s far less fun. > > Note that as I have previously said, the role of Tech Advisor is ill defined > at the IETF level already, and is especially a poor fit for dnsop, which is > literally a room full of Tech Advisors. It puts an uncomfortable poorly > defined weight on the opinion of one dns expert’s view. (I hold this view > this irrespectively of the person assigned to this role, past, current and > future, and think this position should be abolished entirely, including the > one I am uncomfortably holding at WIMSE - I think that was a mistake too and > I’d be happy to lose that role there) > > Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
