On 25/06/15 12:42, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: Hi Eberhard,
> However, even though I am quite partial to clear language (which I > most certainly have used if approached like this) and I do not want to > incite a meta-discussion here, the original post reads counterproductive > > It is not that anyone is entitled to a report, or to see DS records > in the root, or to a timeframe. One may not be entitled to a report, but KeNIC promised one, and didn't deliver it. The DS record is a different issue. If I have registered domains in .KE, and they're signed, then the secure delegation chain is broken, then I expect KeNIC to do something about it. At the very least, I expect them to tell me what they plan on doing. Regards, Anand
