You are not being helpful. -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 09:22, Anand Buddhdev <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 25/06/15 13:27, Phil Regnauld wrote: > > Hi Phil, > >>> One may not be entitled to a report, but KeNIC promised one, and didn't >>> deliver it. >> >> Promised to who ? > > To me, at least: > > https://twitter.com/kenictld/status/583549933661331456 I am quite sure it will be forthcoming shortly. > > They also said they would reintroduce the DS record by 11 April: > > https://twitter.com/kenictld/status/585327605622050816 And so they didn't manage, so what. > >>> The DS record is a different issue. If I have registered domains in .KE, >>> and they're signed, then the secure delegation chain is broken, then I >>> expect KeNIC to do something about it. At the very least, I expect them >>> to tell me what they plan on doing. >> >> But have you registered a domain under .KE ? > > I don't have any personal domains in .KE at the moment, but I was born > and raised in Kenya, and still have family and friends there. They have > .KE domains. My inability to communicate with them, and their inability > to communicate with me, using .KE domains, makes this issue rather > important to me. You ARE able to communicate with them and they ARE able to communicate with you using .KE Domain Names. > >> The report is a service to the community, not an obligation. > > Yes, the report is a nice-to-have, rather than essential. The DS record, > on the other hand, is not optional. KeNIC gave us the candy, and have > now taken it away again. The candy is a ver revealing analogy. > >> The fact that the delegation is broken is certainly something registrars >> and customers here in Kenya can complain about, not us. > > I don't live in Kenya now, but why does that matter? I am affected by > DNSSEC failure in .KE, and I can choose to voice an opinion about it. You ARE not affected, and you could be helpful. > > Regards, > Anand greetings, el
