On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:33 PM, alan mcclellan <Alan.McClellan at sun.com> wrote: > Thanks for the input, Peter! I hear what you're saying, but a question...you > wouldn't expect to find any documentation to use? The release-specific (the > getting started flavor docs, IPS, et al.) docs will also be available via > the .com site. But from a community development standpoint, wouldn't you > want the .org docs community to aggregate the information that might be > useful to you?
Well, yes, obviously. It just struck me that the balance and focus was all wrong. It took me a while to realize that there was anything about how to contribute or what the documentation community did as a community on the page at all - it just looked like Doc central for 2008.xx. My initial response was based on my gut 'Huh?' feeling. Having thought about this a little more, how about a 2-column approach, with 'Documentation produced' as one column and 'Tools, downloads, work in progress, and how to contribute' as the other column? [Clearly, the column titles need some work...] -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
