I've made a few updates based in your inputs. Kept the quickstart, but dropped the Q&A table approach. Tried to make the community participation info more standalone and evident by separating it from the bit for administrators and developers. Better balance and clearer focus? Take a look and let me know what you think:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/HomeTest/ -alan -- Alan McClellan OpenSolaris Documentation Community Manager #32171 +1 719-352-0993 http://blogs.sun.com/docexchange/ alan mcclellan wrote: > Okay. I'll play around with some ways to organize the top level links. > Sounds like the 2008.11 stuff at the top seemed to prominent. But will > wait just a bit to see what other comments come in so hopefully can try > to distill them into one response. > > -alan > > Peter Tribble wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:33 PM, alan mcclellan <Alan.McClellan at sun.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks for the input, Peter! I hear what you're saying, but a question...you >>> wouldn't expect to find any documentation to use? The release-specific (the >>> getting started flavor docs, IPS, et al.) docs will also be available via >>> the .com site. But from a community development standpoint, wouldn't you >>> want the .org docs community to aggregate the information that might be >>> useful to you? >>> >>> >> Well, yes, obviously. It just struck me that the balance and focus was >> all wrong. >> It took me a while to realize that there was anything about how to >> contribute or >> what the documentation community did as a community on the page at all - it >> just looked like Doc central for 2008.xx. >> >> My initial response was based on my gut 'Huh?' feeling. Having thought about >> this a little more, how about a 2-column approach, with 'Documentation >> produced' >> as one column and 'Tools, downloads, work in progress, and how to >> contribute' as >> the other column? [Clearly, the column titles need some work...] >> >> >> > >
