Okay. I'll play around with some ways to organize the top level links. Sounds like the 2008.11 stuff at the top seemed to prominent. But will wait just a bit to see what other comments come in so hopefully can try to distill them into one response.
-alan Peter Tribble wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:33 PM, alan mcclellan <Alan.McClellan at sun.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the input, Peter! I hear what you're saying, but a question...you >> wouldn't expect to find any documentation to use? The release-specific (the >> getting started flavor docs, IPS, et al.) docs will also be available via >> the .com site. But from a community development standpoint, wouldn't you >> want the .org docs community to aggregate the information that might be >> useful to you? >> > > Well, yes, obviously. It just struck me that the balance and focus was > all wrong. > It took me a while to realize that there was anything about how to contribute > or > what the documentation community did as a community on the page at all - it > just looked like Doc central for 2008.xx. > > My initial response was based on my gut 'Huh?' feeling. Having thought about > this a little more, how about a 2-column approach, with 'Documentation > produced' > as one column and 'Tools, downloads, work in progress, and how to contribute' > as > the other column? [Clearly, the column titles need some work...] > > -- Alan McClellan OpenSolaris Documentation Community Manager #32171 +1 719-352-0993 http://blogs.sun.com/docexchange/
