There is one thing I've noticed in documentation, and I feel should be 
considered an "error", or whatever the polite, editorial term is. :-)

At the bottom of page 84, there is an "Incorrect:" followed by the example, 
then a "Correct:". The associated example is at the top of the following page. 
As an end user of documentation that did this sort of thing, I have found this 
jarring. I would suggest a forced page break, and the "Correct:" with example 
following all on the same (next) page.

That's my first "put back" so far. :-)

Rainer
PS I haven't seen mention of orphans and widows yet, but I also haven't noticed 
any, either! ;-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to