Hi all,

Articles have the same technical needs as all the other documents we 
want to produce for opensolaris, so maybe it is better to say not that 
we have conflicting projects, but that we'll grapple with common 
hurdles: license, authoring tools, review cycles, style guidelines. If 
the articles project manages some of these hurdles more quickly, then 
we can leverage that speed here too. I certainly would endorse such a 
project and hope to learn something from it and add something to it. 

-Michelle
 
 
>X-Original-To: docs-discuss at opensolaris.org
>Delivered-To: docs-discuss at opensolaris.org
>Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:12:01 -0800
>From: Stephen Hahn <sch at eng.sun.com>
>To: Ben Rockwood <benr at cuddletech.com>
>Subject: Re: [docs-discuss] Cross Post: OpenSolaris Articles Project
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
>Cc: docs-discuss at opensolaris.org
>X-BeenThere: docs-discuss at opensolaris.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
>List-Id: General documentation discussion and requests to contribute 
documentation <docs-discuss.opensolaris.org>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/docs-discuss>,  
<mailto:docs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/docs-discuss>
>List-Post: <mailto:docs-discuss at opensolaris.org>
>List-Help: <mailto:docs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/docs-discuss>, 
<mailto:docs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org?subject=subscribe>
>
>* Ben Rockwood <benr at cuddletech.com> [2006-01-23 13:03]:
>> .... to ensure that that effort does not duplicate or conflict with
>> existing or future projects of this, the docs, community.
>
>  I think it's reasonable to comment that a particular project's aims
>  might duplicate or conflict with a community's unidentified future
>  projects, but those unidentified projects must be quickly 
identified.
>
>  However, I don't believe any community can monitor "all things
>  written", so I wonder what projects you might mean.  (For instance, 
in
>  such a scheme, any composition efforts the new SysAdmin community
>  might pursue could be perceived as duplicative or in conflict.)
>
>  Certainly the Documentation community can choose not to endorse the
>  Articles project's work, but I am curious what more it should do.  
(In
>  fact, I am wondering why any choice other than attempting to coopt
>  them would seem attractive.)
>
>  - Stephen
>
>-- 
>Stephen Hahn, PhD  Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
>stephen.hahn at sun.com  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
>_______________________________________________
>docs-discuss mailing list
>docs-discuss at opensolaris.org


Reply via email to