I'd like to propose that we retire (ie, svn delete) translations in 2.4 that are more than, say, 2 years out of date, as they assuredly don't reflect the current state of things, and do a disservice to our customers. Leaving them in trunk seems harmless, but having them in a released product is misleading.
I haven't yet done the actual poking around to determine which translations that would be, but I'd suspect .ja, .ko, .es and .de? Or we could be more selective, and get rid of translations of things (authnz, logging, proxy) that we know for certain has radically changed in the last few years, while leaving things like the index files that may still be worthwhile. -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen rbo...@apache.org
