On Wednesday 28 March 2012 15:33:01 Rich Bowen wrote: > I'd like to propose that we retire (ie, svn delete) translations in 2.4 > that are more than, say, 2 years out of date, as they assuredly don't > reflect the current state of things, and do a disservice to our customers. > Leaving them in trunk seems harmless, but having them in a released product > is misleading. > > I haven't yet done the actual poking around to determine which translations > that would be, but I'd suspect .ja, .ko, .es and .de? > > Or we could be more selective, and get rid of translations of things > (authnz, logging, proxy) that we know for certain has radically changed in > the last few years, while leaving things like the index files that may > still be worthwhile.
My (unbacked) guess is, that the out-of-dateness is mostly missing directives and otherwise tweaks here and there. I'd rather adjust the xslt to include a (translated) reference to the english directive docs as a placeholder. That way we don't lose the rest (which may or maybe not accurate). nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
