On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > I'd like to propose that we retire (ie, svn delete) translations in 2.4 that > are more than, say, 2 years out of date, as they assuredly don't reflect the > current state of things, and do a disservice to our customers. Leaving them > in trunk seems harmless, but having them in a released product is misleading. > > I haven't yet done the actual poking around to determine which translations > that would be, but I'd suspect .ja, .ko, .es and .de? > > Or we could be more selective, and get rid of translations of things (authnz, > logging, proxy) that we know for certain has radically changed in the last > few years, while leaving things like the index files that may still be > worthwhile.
I'd prefer that we add CSS with an age-based discoloration of the page and associated watermark, but I have no time to find the right CSS. ....Roy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
