Le 28 mars 2012 à 16:42, Daniel Gruno a écrit : > On 28-03-2012 16:09, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:33:01AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: >>>> I'd like to propose that we retire (ie, svn delete) translations in 2.4 >>>> that are more than, say, 2 years out of date >> >> For a metric, Daniel has provided this: >> http://www.humbedooh.com/outdated/2.4/ >> Translations that are, say, 500,000 revisions out of date might be good >> candidates to purge? >> > +1 to that - Personally I'd probably go even further and cut it off at 250k > revisions (the equivalent of 1 year), but 500k would also be a good start. > > If we are to retire the documents, I would advise that we give a fair warning > to at least users@ that we are retiring this and this document, so anyone > interested can fix it up if they have the time for it. Something like: > core.xml.ja is now 3 years behind the English version and will be retired in > one month unless updated. Maybe send the warnings in a condensed, > per-language mail. But that's just my silly idea. > > With regards, > Daniel.
+1 to that Lucien Gentis SIRET Faculté de Médecine - Nancy lucien.gen...@medecine.uhp-nancy.fr 03 83 68 30 62
