Le 31/01/11 11:13, Karl-Heinz Gödderz a écrit : Hi,
> it isn't space - it's motivation. > > Most of the "OOo-veterans" are used to work with OOoAuthors and are not > interested to use the new system because the old one works and it takes > time to learn a new CMS. > > So only newbies on LibO would use alfresco and the others want to stay > with ODFAuthors. I do not consider myself a newbie with regard to the documentation project, yet I will be using, or at least experimenting, with Alfresco and its workflow for any French or English documentation I might produce. As an example, I am currently working offline on the Getting Started with Base translation into French. I do not feel forced into using Alfresco at all, the simple fact of the matter for me was that I found OOoAuthors and the workflow far too confusing for it to be of any use to me. However, that is my personal choice, and I'm certainly not going to impose it on anyone else. > > There should be no pressure to use alfresco because with this, we would > lose all the "old" authors. Alfresco has now to be given a chance to > prove being better than ODFAuthors and has to convince them. I have seen no pressure from anyone here to use Alfresco, I don't feel under pressure to do so, I will try it because I want to. If it doesn't suit my needs, I can just go back to doing it by myself and making my documents available through other channels. > > In the meantime there has to be a coordination which documents is on > alfresco and which on ODFAuthors so that each author can use the system > that fits him best. The wiki would seem like a good place to put this kind of information, but IMHO it should be left up to the native language project members to update the status of the documentation and inform others of who is doing what and where (if known). Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
