No chance with Bernard Eckey....see belowRob Hi Rob
In response to your e-mail I'm enclosing an e-mail sent to Brian Marshall. I trust it explains the situation and my predicament. Kind regards Bernard Hi Brian I'm sorry to hear that you have encountered difficulties with H.P. However, I hope you understand that I can not deviate from a procedure that was agreed to by Diamond Aircraft, Hawker Pacific and myself. Kind regards Bernard ............................................. --- On Sun, 3/6/12, Nigel Baker <[email protected]> wrote: From: Nigel Baker <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] H36 3000 hour inspection To: [email protected] Received: Sunday, 3 June, 2012, 8:02 PM He indicated it would be fine. Cheers. Nige. From: Ian Williams Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 8:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DOG mailing list] H36 3000 hour inspection Hi Nigel and all, I guess Burnard would have no problem dealing with dealing with me in NZ Hawkers over here are just not interested. Regards Ian Williams From: Ian Mc Phee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 9:54 a.m. To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] H36 3000 hour inspection thanks Nigel and well put. Looks like apart from one or two rusted airbrake tubes h36s are passing the 3000hly so looks like the hk36 people get the benefit which is fair enough. My experience with open ended steel tubes or where glass is "glued" with microballoon onto a steel tube plays up. Scheibe on other had tell you nothing. All cables are on condition and in my case lasted 8000hrs or 20 years.Even a special german clear site tube for fuel is "on condition" which I actually do not agree with. Nigel - Bernard is not keen on me for some reason but please tell him I am really OK Ian M On 30 May 2012 21:36, Nigel Baker <[email protected]> wrote: AAHHHH that’s cause it comes from a different decade. Remember the 3000 bit was retrospective on all stuff already built when the LBA wanted to define a life. After that the new design stuff eventually came with 6000 when they realised it wasn’t that pressing an issue. The final 12000 TOTAL TIS came after all the test results from the GFA and MIT fatigue testing was finished when the test rig broke and there wasn’t funding to fix it and continue testing past 36000 hours hence work on 3-1 and you get a conservative and industry accepted FoS of 12000 hours. The factory’s and the LBA accepted our test results. However Schleicher have given the ASK21 a life of 18000 TOTAL TIS when not used for aerobatics which it is rated for. Thus design for the higher denominator and if you don’t use it give back 33.3% thus 1 in 3 and the above rule applies and it is back to 12000 TIS. I hope that made sense. It did to the LBA and the Schleicher engineers Nige. From: Ian Mc Phee Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 5:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] H36 3000 hour inspection Agree but think they want our results so as they can work out what problems are. I discovered HK 36 first inspection is 6000 hrs which is interesting. Ian m On May 30, 2012 4:32 PM, "Rob Thompson" <[email protected]> wrote: Can anyone explain the life extension process here? If we do all the required work and tests as per the schedule and it is signed out by a inspector with a survey ticket, why do we have to deal with the Diamond factory? Rob PO Box 129, Lawson, NSW, 2783. mobile 0429 493828
