Tail wheel shimmy on the H36 is almost always caused by a slight bend in
the vertical shaft where it comes out of the fuselage.
Sometimes barely visible - you have to take the fork assembly out to check
it.

John.


On 27 July 2017 at 07:15, Michael Stockhill <[email protected]> wrote:

> Greg, what you have sounds very similar to the problem we rectified on my
> friend's h36, which also has the springless tailwheel fork.
>
> It has been a couple years and this greybeard's memory is flawed, but here
> is what I recall:
>
> What I found was that the tailwheel fork's axle (vertical, if that term is
> valid), was misshapen rather than round, and at its base, where it is
> welded into a larger tube that is a component of the fork, there was some
> wear.  The wear meant that that edge was not perfectly perpendicular to the
> axle axis, but was in a plane a degree or two off.
>
> Most landings could shake you teeth out. We tried various tire pressures,
> etc.
>
> If it has ever been disassembled there is a chance that all the bushings
> and spacers were not reinstalled in proper sequence
>
> Michael
>
> On Jul 26, 2017 2:51 PM, "Greg Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I haven't found propwash to be a problem but tailwheel shimmy is
>> something my H36 suffers from. I've tightened the tail wheel steering &
>> rudder cables as much as possible but is hasn't helped much.
>>
>> Mine is "A" version without tailwheel shock absorbers. I generally land
>> on grass & keep taxi speed down to avoid the shimmy. Not only uncomfortable
>> but also chews out tailwheels fast.
>>
>> Anyone have a solution?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Greg.
>>
>>
>> Greg Wilson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:38:12 +1000 Michael Stockhill<
>> [email protected]> wrote ----
>>
>> Thanks, Tom and Laurie,
>>
>> I live in Polson, Montana.  I did fly another H36 and don't recall it
>> having that tendency, however it had its own problems, being very tail
>> heavy and with a tailwheel fork issue of its own that caused it to set up
>> an oscillation that would shake your teeth out. I was able to sort that out
>> for the owner.
>>
>> You have given me lots of ideas for some trouble shooting. It is
>> refreshing to know that this tendency may not be typical of the breed.
>>
>> M
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2017 1:00 AM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Tom,
>> I was thinking something along these lines. An issue between rudder and
>> tailwheel interplay perhaps. I know of instances of steering/rudder cables
>> being too tight that have caused Dimona operators over controlling problems
>> during the ground run. The comment of the previous owner of Michael's
>> aircraft and the faulty tailwheel repair seems to confirm the possibility.
>> I'm no engineer though and Rob, Nigel, Macca and others would know best.
>> I don't have the wide T/W experience that you have Michael, about 1000hrs
>> in SuperCubs, a few in Pawnees, Callair and some several hundreds in TMGs.
>> I've flown quite a few TMG types and I have to say that after something
>> like 15 years of operating, our Dimona is an absolute delight both in the
>> air and on the ground.
>> The other owners and myself have taken off and landed in what on
>> occasions were horrendous cross wind conditions and the Dimona has handled
>> them all wonderfully despite not having differential braking.
>> If possible i would strongly recommend that you fly in another H36 to see
>> if there is any difference to yours. Just remind me where you are located
>> pls.
>> I don't believe asymmetric blade effect to be of any real consequence
>> with the L2000 and doesn't appear to be noticeable with the L2400.
>> Compared with the other aircraft that you have flown the Dimona certainly
>> does need sensitive control input. Just a thought, but after your extensive
>> experience with US clockwise rotating engines and even though you are aware
>> of the difference, any chance that you may still be unconsciously applying
>> right rudder during rotation? Also wondering if you have any gliding
>> experience in FRP aircraft Michael with which you can compare the H36.
>> Best Regards
>> Laurie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> On Wednesday, July 26, 2017, 12:17:05 PM GMT+10, <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> My dimona S.n. 3506 had developed ovalized bolt holes on the tailwheel
>> steering horn over time (circled green in attached drawing from H36 parts
>> manual). Although I had previously adjusted the turnbuckles to align
>> the rudder and tailwheel, a subsequent off center touchdown would misalign
>> the rudder and wheel – resulting in a startling  condition in which
>> straight rudder input yielded a strong turning output, ground loop imminent.
>>
>> The cause of the problem became apparent when I held the rudder firmly
>> while twisting the tailwheel –  three degrees of play was then evident.
>> Disassembly of the tailwheel drive  horn revealed the wear on the horn tube
>> where it is fixed to the tailwheel shaft with two M10 bolts. Repair was
>> accomplished by slightly reaming the oval holes until roundness was
>> restored, and then bushing the M10 bolts for a tight fit – no play even
>> before tightening the bolts.
>>
>> I now include visual tailwheel udder alignment check as part of my
>> positive control check before flight..even a little misalignment results in
>> nasty directional behavior right after the wheels leave the ground and
>> right after they touch down.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Sent from Windows Mail
>>
>> *From:* Michael Stockhill <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* ‎Tuesday‎, ‎July‎ ‎25‎, ‎2017 ‎8‎:‎40‎ ‎PM
>> *To:* [email protected], Laurie Hoffman <[email protected]>
>>
>> Thanks Laurie and Ian.
>>
>> I've owned my Dimona 16 years.  I have about a thousand hours in
>> taildraggers up to a DC-3, owned a Cessna 180, and flew a dehavilland
>> Beaver for a few seasons before moving onto other things.  I have flown
>> many different tailwheel types and must say that my Dimona's ground
>> handling is the most sensitive (to the point of occasionally being
>> seriously uncomfortable) of anything I recall having flown. (When I asked
>> the previous owner about crossword handling, he said to just go someplace
>> else.)
>>
>> There were at least a couple instances where I had PIO on the rudders
>> during landing before I determined that the tailwheel fork had been
>> repaired with zero degrees castor or rake. It was very squirrelly and easy
>> to over control on the ground before I reworked the tailwheel fork. That
>> made it much better, but it has always wanted to head for the weeds (to the
>> right) as the tail comes up for takeoff. (Perhaps when the tailwheel leaves
>> the surface.)
>>
>> Much of the time I attributed this to habitual taildragger habit patterns
>> of using right rudder during takeoff to compensate for P factor and
>> gyroscopic effects rather than left rudder on the Dimona.
>>
>> Inflight handling, trim, and rigging are fine, other than pretty heavy
>> ailerons in powered cruise flight.
>>
>> Although the book suggests a three point takeoff, I have always raised
>> the tail at thirty knots or so (I have never really noted that speed as it
>> is only when the airplane is ready, so don't hold me to that number). Wings
>> are level with no aileron input to cause adverse yaw, but there is a
>> significant yaw excursion.
>>
>> I seem pretty much used to this now, but have been working with a friend
>> so he can fly my bird.  He was a Naval aviator--a Top Gun spin instructor
>> in F-18s etc.  After a few takeoffs threatening a visit with the weeds he
>> said he's never flown anything before that he couldn't comfortably take
>> off.  I have offered to come up with a way of providing him with a cat shot!
>>
>> This doesn't seem normal. It is like there is quarter right rudder as the
>> tailwheel leaves the ground, so we have lots of fun overcorrecting.
>>
>> I really want to revisit neutral rudder and tailwheel to see if there is
>> any deflection, but last time I looked I couldn't see anything out of the
>> ordinary. I will get into the service manual soon (after an engine repair
>> on my PIK-20E, with is another eventful story) and look into rigging.
>>
>> So anyway, what do you folks experience?  This is way more than P factor.
>> It is always a challenge to stay anywhere near the runway centerline on
>> takeoff roll. I tend to let it find a line it likes rather than risk
>> overcontolling.  None of this seems normal for an aircraft with a long tail
>> arm, although the maingear seems quite a bit forward of most designs and
>> configurations.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2017 4:48 PM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I get the impression that Michael experiences the aircraft pulling to the
>> right on most/all of his take offs on rotation?
>>
>> Cross winds would explain only some of these. I can't recall ever
>> noticing it Michael. Is it yawing only or is there some initial roll there
>> too?
>>
>> If you simulate the low speed flight in the air does that reproduce it?
>> Possibly a rigging or control deflection issue.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Laurie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> On Tuesday, July 25, 2017, 10:33:18 PM GMT+10, Ian Mc Phee <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yep RHS x winds are always an issue.  Have a look at the bight of prop
>> and upward going prop and downward going prop. Big difference
>>
>> Ian McPhee
>> 0428847642 <0428%20847%20642>
>> Box 657 Byron Bay NSW 2481
>>
>> On 25 Jul 2017 10:03 am, "Michael Stockhill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Have any Dimona operators found that their bird diverges to the right
>> when rotating for takeoff? Mine consistently does that as the tailwheel
>> lifts off. After 400 or so flights I think I am past adding right rudder
>> for a prop that turns contrary to all the taildraggers I have flown.
>>
>>  Michael Stockhill
>> Polson MT
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2017 3:23 PM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Rob you forgot to mention that on two of those occasions when we had prop
>> work done, that there were other faults also.
>> The blades looked like they had been refinished by someone who had never
>> spray painted before. At least once there was an issue with seal
>> installation with grease being sprayed everywhere on use.
>> Laurie
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo7 Mail on Android
>> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>>
>> On Sun, 23 Jul, 2017 at 6:16 am, Ian Williams
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>> Can you explain the difference in TBO between the BT and T blades ?   I
>> thought both were the same.
>> Best regards
>> Ian Williams
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 22/07/2017, at 7:51 PM, Rob Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I just heard that GFA has adopted the CASA rules on overhauling
>> propellers. See http://services.casa.gov.au/airworth/airwd/ADfiles/equip
>> /prop/PROP-001.pdf
>>
>> This means that as soon as it is documented in the system there is no
>> longer a calendar time for overhauls.
>>
>> Ian McPhee has been dealing with Prop Care (www.propcare.com.au) in
>> Brisbane for Hoffman overhauls and hopefully they will be soon doing work
>> on Hoffman props.
>>
>> We are continuing to have a nightmare run with Eric at Australian Air
>> Props at Bankstown. 3 times in the past 2 years our prop has come back to
>> us with problems. Once *WAY* out of balance then next time set much too
>> coarse and only pulling 2000 at full power. Then recently he sent it back
>> to us with the counterweights set incorrectly and the rpm was fluctuating
>> on run up and early take off roll.
>>
>> Add to that he charges a fortune because he knows that the only other
>> option in Australia is to send the props to Germany. Up near $4000 now for
>> about 10-15 hours work.
>>
>> Fingers crossed that the Brisbane mob will be able to do them.
>>
>> Rob Thompson
>> 0429 493 828
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on
>> behalf of Michael Stockhill <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Monday, 17 July 2017 4:23 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]; Laurie Hoffman
>> *Subject:* Re: [DOG mailing list] H36 Ignition Switch (and brakes)
>>
>> For what it is worth, the mag switches on my Aztec with similar magnetos
>> are rated at 6 amps 125V a.c./dc.  The p lead grounds the primary coil. I
>> found one source that says the primary coil puts out about 150 volts. The
>> secondary coil puts out 10-15000 Volts. 40 amp or even 20 amp rated switch
>> looks like overkill for whatever reason. Maybe consevative because we only
>> get one of them.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2017 1:29 AM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom and Mike,
>>
>> Rob and I have the wreck of an H36 from which we have salvaged many parts
>> for our functioning H36, especially the L2400 which we had top overhauled.
>>
>> Tom, I gritted my teeth and dived back into the wreck to recover the
>> ignition switch and a panel switch. The wreck is already well dismantled
>> however I still had a cow of a job getting access to the switches and
>> removing these. I dread to think how much time it would take to install a
>> new switch in the original position in a complete panel. My strong
>> recommendation is that if you have an ignition switch failure seriously
>> consider installing a new switch in another location on the panel, simply
>> reroute the wiring from the old to the new and then cover up the old switch
>> and placard the new.
>>
>> Although psychically the switch toggles and bodies appear the same, the
>> switches have a very different rating. The panel switch is rated 15A while
>> the ignition switch is rated 40A!
>>
>> The link that you posted to a new switch I just noticed is only rated
>> 20A. Maybe something like this one Tom....
>> Longacre 45423 40 Amp Weatherproof Toggle switch #1731 | eBay
>> <http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Longacre-45423-40-Amp-Weatherproof-Toggle-switch-1731-/272686767789?epid=708201179&hash=item3f7d65dead:g:4QcAAOSw~FJZJvde>
>>
>> $ 22.95
>> Longacre 45423 40 Amp Weatherproof Toggle switch #1731 | eBay
>> Longacre 45423 40 Amp Weatherproof Toggle switch #1731 in | eBay!
>>
>> <http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Longacre-45423-40-Amp-Weatherproof-Toggle-switch-1731-/272686767789?epid=708201179&hash=item3f7d65dead:g:4QcAAOSw~FJZJvde>
>>
>>
>> In Oz I have found Narva (driving light manufacturers) switches which
>> look suitable. Heavy duty and this one rated at 50A for 12v.
>>
>> Heavy Duty - Products - Narva
>> <http://www.narva.com.au/products/browse/heavy-duty-2>
>>
>> Heavy Duty - Products - Narva
>> <http://www.narva.com.au/products/browse/heavy-duty-2>
>>
>>
>> The wreck is a Mk2 by the way while our operational H36 is a Mk1 so if
>> anyone needs a good Mk2 wing or two, let us know!
>>
>>
>>
>> Re hydraulic fluid, we use only OM16 which I gather is equivalent to 5606.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Laurie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Michael Stockhill <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Saturday, 15 July 2017, 10:13
>> *Subject:* Re: [DOG mailing list] H36 Ignition Switch (and brakes)
>>
>> Hi Tom et al
>>
>> I think I found that the MS  O rings are okay.  Mine were fine through
>> two rebuilds (preventative maintenance each time I  put on new tires) over
>> 16 years.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2017 10:01 AM, "Tom Preisser" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Laurie,
>>
>> I have what I believe to be an ignition switch in my spares.  Can't be
>> positive without digging behind the panel to look at my installed switch,
>> but you can check your removed switch against it.  The spec is MS 35058-22 
>> http://www.bandc.aero/
>> toggleswitch-MS35058-22.aspx
>> <http://www.bandc.aero/toggleswitch-MS35058-22.aspx>
>>
>> And I think it could be a different spec to the other fuel pump, etc
>> switches (beefier), given that it has a separate entry than the 15A
>> switches in the old H36 parts manual (with part numbers no longer valid for
>> Diamond)...
>>
>> BTW on brakes (and thanks Mike for your advice)... just now installing a
>> new caliper piston which makes the O ring fit much better in the
>> cylinder (seems I had to take off too much corroded material from the
>> groove of the original installed one, so it no longer sealed tightly)...
>>
>> For those of you running DOT3 fluid, I have obtained some EPDM O-rings to
>> use rather than the BNR (nitrile) MS-28775-218 O-rings supplied to me by
>> Diamond (which they may have sent probably because the HK36 and DA20 use
>> 5606 aviation brake fluid).  See this RAS thread for the details on why BNR
>> is not suitable for DOT3...
>> https://groups.google.com/ forum/#!topic/rec.aviation. soaring/4MiwHrkryFg
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/rec.aviation.soaring/4MiwHrkryFg>
>>
>> And I talked to a lady who has worked at Cleveland Brakes for decades,
>> and she gasped!! when I said that Hoffmann used DOT3.  She says Cleveland
>> only recommends aviation brake fluid - but I'm sticking with DOT3 as per
>> the US type certificate!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Laurie Hoffman via dog <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After extensive investigation into intermittent electrical problems
>> eventually developing into a situation where the motor had to be shut down
>> in flight due to rough running, it appears that the culprit is the ignition
>> switch.
>>
>> Physically, the switch appears identical to the other original panel
>> toggle switches operating fuel pump, avionics, strobe etc.
>>
>> Does anyone know if they are the same switch and also is there anyone out
>> there in DOG land who might have specs for the switches?
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Laurie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Greg Wilson <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Sunday, 18 June 2017, 8:10
>> *Subject:* [DOG mailing list] Easy fit ADSB
>>
>> These are a very easy install and cheap too.
>>
>> https://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/wow-these-are-
>> good-looking-gadjets.161803/
>>
>>
>> Greg Wilson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------
>> You are subscribed to the Dimona Owners Group mailing list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email to: dog-unsubscribe@lists. riverland.net.au
>> <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You are subscribed to the Dimona Owners Group mailing list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email to: [email protected]
>>
>>

Reply via email to