I haven't found propwash to be a problem but tailwheel shimmy is 
something my H36 suffers from. I've tightened the tail wheel steering & rudder 
cables as much as possible but is hasn't helped much.Mine is "A" version 
without tailwheel shock absorbers. I generally land on grass & keep taxi speed 
down to avoid the shimmy. Not only uncomfortable but also chews out tailwheels 
fast.Anyone have a solution?Thanks,Greg.Greg Wilson---- On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 
22:38:12 +1000  Michael Stockhill<[email protected]> wrote ----Thanks, Tom and 
Laurie,I live in Polson, Montana.  I did fly another H36 and don't recall it 
having that tendency, however it had its own problems, being very tail heavy 
and with a tailwheel fork issue of its own that caused it to set up an 
oscillation that would shake your teeth out. I was able to sort that out for 
the owner.You have given me lots of ideas for some trouble shooting. It is 
refreshing to know that this tendency may not be typical of the breed.MOn Jul 
26, 2017 1:00 AM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <[email protected]> 
wrote:Thanks Tom,I was thinking something along these lines. An issue between 
rudder and tailwheel interplay perhaps. I know of instances of steering/rudder 
cables being too tight that have caused Dimona operators over controlling 
problems during the ground run. The comment of the previous owner of Michael's 
aircraft and the faulty tailwheel repair seems to confirm the possibility.I'm 
no engineer though and Rob, Nigel, Macca and others would know best.I don't 
have the wide T/W experience that you have Michael, about 1000hrs in SuperCubs, 
a few in Pawnees, Callair and some several hundreds in TMGs. I've flown quite a 
few TMG types and I have to say that after something like 15 years of 
operating, our Dimona is an absolute delight both in the air and on the 
ground.The other owners and myself have taken off and landed in what on 
occasions were horrendous cross wind conditions and the Dimona has handled them 
all wonderfully despite not having differential braking.If possible i would 
strongly recommend that you fly in another H36 to see if there is any 
difference to yours. Just remind me where you are located pls.I don't believe 
asymmetric blade effect to be of any real consequence with the L2000 and 
doesn't appear to be noticeable with the L2400.Compared with the other aircraft 
that you have flown the Dimona certainly does need sensitive control input. 
Just a thought, but after your extensive experience with US clockwise rotating 
engines and even though you are aware of the difference, any chance that you 
may still be unconsciously applying right rudder during rotation? Also 
wondering if you have any gliding experience in FRP aircraft Michael with which 
you can compare the H36.Best RegardsLaurie On Wednesday, July 26, 2017, 
12:17:05 PM GMT+10,  <[email protected]> wrote: Dear all, My dimona S.n. 
3506 had developed ovalized bolt holes on the tailwheel steering horn over time 
(circled green in attached drawing from H36 parts manual). Although I had 
previously adjusted the turnbuckles to align the rudder and tailwheel,  a 
subsequent off center touchdown would misalign the rudder and wheel – resulting 
in a startling  condition in which straight rudder input yielded a strong 
turning output, ground loop imminent. The cause of the problem became apparent 
when I held the rudder firmly while twisting the tailwheel –  three degrees of 
play was then evident. Disassembly of the tailwheel drive  horn revealed the 
wear on the horn tube where it is fixed  to the tailwheel shaft with two M10 
bolts. Repair was accomplished by slightly reaming the oval holes until 
roundness was restored, and then bushing the M10 bolts for a tight fit – no 
play even before tightening the bolts.  I now include visual tailwheel
udder alignment check as part of my positive control check before flight..even 
a little misalignment results in nasty directional behavior right after the 
wheels leave the ground and right after they touch  down. Cheers, TomSent from 
Windows MailFrom: Michael StockhillSent: ‎Tuesday‎, ‎July‎ ‎25‎, ‎2017 ‎8‎:‎40‎ 
‎PMTo: [email protected], Laurie HoffmanThanks Laurie and Ian.I've 
owned my Dimona 16 years.  I have about a thousand hours in taildraggers up to 
a DC-3, owned a Cessna 180, and flew a dehavilland Beaver for a few seasons 
before moving onto other things.  I have flown many different tailwheel types 
and must say that my Dimona's ground handling is the most sensitive (to the 
point of occasionally being seriously uncomfortable) of anything I recall 
having flown. (When I asked the previous owner about crossword handling, he 
said to just go someplace else.)There were at least a couple instances where I 
had PIO on the rudders during landing before I determined that the tailwheel 
fork had been repaired with zero degrees castor or rake. It was very squirrelly 
and easy to over control on the ground before I reworked the tailwheel fork. 
That made it much better, but it has always wanted to head for the weeds (to 
the right) as the tail comes up for takeoff. (Perhaps when the tailwheel leaves 
the surface.)Much of the time I attributed this to habitual taildragger habit 
patterns of using right rudder during takeoff to compensate for P factor and 
gyroscopic effects rather than left rudder on the Dimona.Inflight handling, 
trim, and rigging are fine, other than pretty heavy ailerons in powered cruise 
flight.Although the book suggests a three point takeoff, I have always raised 
the tail at thirty knots or so (I have never really noted that speed as it is 
only when the airplane is ready, so don't hold me to that number). Wings are 
level with no aileron input to cause adverse yaw, but there is a significant 
yaw excursion.I seem pretty much used to this now, but have been working with a 
friend so he can fly my bird.  He was a Naval aviator--a Top Gun spin 
instructor in F-18s etc.  After a few takeoffs threatening a visit with the 
weeds he said he's never flown anything before that he couldn't comfortably 
take off.  I have offered to come up with a way of providing him with a cat 
shot!This doesn't seem normal. It is like there is quarter right rudder as the 
tailwheel leaves the ground, so we have lots of fun overcorrecting.I really 
want to revisit neutral rudder and tailwheel to see if there is any deflection, 
but last time I looked I couldn't see anything out of the ordinary. I will get 
into the service manual soon (after an engine repair on my PIK-20E, with is 
another eventful story) and look into rigging.So anyway, what do you folks 
experience?  This is way more than P factor. It is always a challenge to stay 
anywhere near the runway centerline on takeoff roll. I tend to let it find a 
line it likes rather than risk overcontolling.  None of this seems normal for 
an aircraft with a long tail arm, although the maingear seems quite a bit 
forward of most designs and configurations.Cheers,MichaelOn Jul 25, 2017 4:48 
PM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <[email protected]> wrote:I get the 
impression that Michael experiences the aircraft pulling to the right on 
most/all of his take offs on rotation?Cross winds would explain only some of 
these. I can't recall ever noticing it Michael. Is it yawing only or is there 
some initial roll there too?If you simulate the low speed flight in the air 
does that reproduce it? Possibly a rigging or control deflection issue.Best 
RegardsLaurie On Tuesday, July 25, 2017, 10:33:18 PM GMT+10, Ian Mc Phee 
<[email protected]> wrote:Yep RHS x winds are always an issue.  Have a look 
at the bight of prop and upward going prop and downward going prop. Big 
differenceIan McPhee 0428847642 Box 657 Byron Bay NSW 2481 On 25 Jul 2017 10:03 
am, "Michael Stockhill" <[email protected]> wrote:Have any Dimona operators 
found that their bird diverges to the right when rotating for takeoff? Mine 
consistently does that as the tailwheel lifts off. After 400 or so flights I 
think I am past adding right rudder for a prop that turns contrary to all the 
taildraggers I have flown. Michael Stockhill Polson MTOn Jul 22, 2017 3:23 PM, 
"Laurie Hoffman via dog" <[email protected]> wrote:Rob you forgot to 
mention that on two of those occasions when we had prop work done, that there 
were other faults also.The blades looked like they had been refinished by 
someone who had never spray painted before. At least once there was an issue 
with seal installation with grease being sprayed everywhere on use.LaurieSent 
from Yahoo7 Mail on Android    On Sun, 23 Jul, 2017 at 6:16 am, Ian 
Williams<[email protected]> wrote:   Hi Rob,Can you explain the difference in 
TBO between the BT and T blades ?   I thought both were the same.Best 
regardsIan WilliamsSent from my iPadOn 22/07/2017, at 7:51 PM, Rob Thompson 
<[email protected]> wrote:   I just heard that GFA has adopted the CASA rules 
on overhauling propellers. See 
http://services.casa.gov.au/airworth/airwd/ADfiles/equip/prop/PROP-001.pdf   
This means that as soon as it is documented in the system there is no longer a 
calendar time for overhauls.     Ian McPhee has been dealing with Prop Care 
(www.propcare.com.au) in Brisbane for Hoffman overhauls and hopefully they will 
 be soon doing work on Hoffman props.   We are continuing to have a nightmare 
run with Eric at Australian Air Props at Bankstown. 3 times in the past 2 years 
our prop has come back to us with problems. Once WAY out of balance then next 
time set much too coarse and only pulling 2000 at full power. Then recently he 
sent it back to us with the counterweights set incorrectly and the rpm was 
fluctuating on run up and early take off roll.    Add to that he charges a 
fortune because he knows that the only other option in Australia is to send the 
props to Germany. Up near $4000 now for about 10-15 hours work.   Fingers 
crossed that the Brisbane mob will be able to do them.   Rob Thompson 0429 493 
828            From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on 
behalf of Michael Stockhill <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 17 July 2017 4:23 
AM To: [email protected]; Laurie Hoffman Subject: Re: [DOG mailing 
list] H36 Ignition Switch (and brakes)     For what it is worth, the mag 
switches on my Aztec with similar magnetos are rated at 6 amps 125V a.c./dc.  
The p lead grounds the primary coil. I found one source that says the primary 
coil puts out about 150 volts. The secondary coil puts  out 10-15000 Volts. 40 
amp or even 20 amp rated switch looks like overkill for whatever reason. Maybe 
consevative because we only get one of them.   Michael   On Jul 15, 2017 1:29 
AM, "Laurie Hoffman via dog" <[email protected]> wrote:    Hi Tom and 
Mike,   Rob and I have the wreck of an H36 from which we have salvaged many 
parts for our functioning H36, especially the L2400  which we had top 
overhauled.   Tom, I gritted my teeth and dived back into the wreck to recover 
the ignition switch and a panel switch. The wreck  is already well dismantled 
however I still had a cow of a job getting access to the switches and removing 
these. I dread to think how much time it would take to install a new switch in 
the original position in a complete panel. My strong recommendation is  that if 
you have an ignition switch failure seriously consider installing a new switch 
in another location on the panel, simply reroute the wiring from the old to the 
new and then cover up the old switch and placard the new.   Although 
psychically the switch toggles and bodies appear the same, the switches have a 
very different rating.  The panel switch is rated 15A while the ignition switch 
is rated 40A!   The link that you posted to a new switch I just noticed is only 
rated 20A. Maybe something like this one Tom....  Longacre  45423 40 Amp 
Weatherproof Toggle switch #1731 | eBay          $ 22.95          Longacre 
45423 40 Amp Weatherproof Toggle switch #1731 | eBay  Longacre 45423 40 Amp 
Weatherproof Toggle switch #1731 in | eBay!         In Oz I have found Narva 
(driving light manufacturers) switches which look suitable. Heavy duty and this 
one rated  at 50A for 12v.   Heavy  Duty - Products - Narva         Heavy Duty 
- Products - Narva          The wreck is a Mk2 by the way while our operational 
H36 is a Mk1 so if anyone needs a good Mk2 wing or two, let us know!       Re  
hydraulic fluid, we use only OM16 which I gather is equivalent to 5606.     
Best Regards  Laurie                    From: Michael Stockhill 
<[email protected]> To:  [email protected]  Sent: Saturday, 15 July 
2017, 10:13 Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] H36 Ignition Switch (and brakes)    
  Hi Tom et al   I think I found that the MS  O rings are okay.  Mine were fine 
through two rebuilds (preventative maintenance each time I  put on new tires) 
over 16 years.   Mike       On Jul 14, 2017 10:01 AM, "Tom Preisser" 
<[email protected]> wrote:    Hi Laurie,   I have what I believe to be an 
ignition switch in my spares.  Can't be positive without digging behind the 
panel to look at my installed switch, but you can check your removed switch 
against  it.  The spec is MS 35058-22  http://www.bandc.aero/ 
toggleswitch-MS35058-22.aspx   And I think it could be a different spec to the 
other fuel pump, etc switches (beefier), given that it has a separate entry 
than the 15A switches in the old H36 parts manual (with part numbers  no longer 
valid for Diamond)...   BTW on brakes (and thanks Mike for your advice)... just 
now installing a new caliper piston which makes the O ring fit much better in 
the cylinder (seems I had to take off too much corroded material from the 
groove of the original installed one, so it  no longer sealed tightly)...   For 
those of you running DOT3 fluid, I have obtained some EPDM O-rings to use 
rather than the BNR (nitrile) MS-28775-218 O-rings supplied to me by Diamond 
(which they may have sent probably  because the HK36 and DA20 use 5606 aviation 
brake fluid).  See this RAS thread for the details on why BNR is not suitable 
for DOT3... https://groups.google.com/  forum/#!topic/rec.aviation. 
soaring/4MiwHrkryFg   And I talked to a lady who has worked at Cleveland Brakes 
for decades, and she gasped!! when I said that Hoffmann used DOT3.  She says 
Cleveland only recommends aviation brake fluid - but I'm  sticking with DOT3 as 
per the US type certificate!   Cheers,    Tom      On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:26 
PM, Laurie Hoffman via dog <[email protected]> wrote:     Hi All,     
After extensive investigation into intermittent electrical problems eventually 
developing into a situation  where the motor had to be shut down in flight due 
to rough running, it appears that the culprit is the ignition switch.     
Physically, the switch appears identical to the other original panel toggle 
switches operating fuel pump,  avionics, strobe etc.     Does anyone know if 
they are the same switch and also is there anyone out there in DOG land who 
might have  specs for the switches?     Best Regards   Laurie                   
         From: Greg Wilson <[email protected]> To:  
[email protected]  Sent: Sunday, 18 June 2017, 8:10 Subject: [DOG 
mailing list] Easy fit ADSB       These are a very easy install and cheap too.  
https://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/wow-these-are-good-looking-gadjets.161803/
    Greg Wilson                         ------------------------------ 
------------------------------ --------- You are subscribed to the Dimona 
Owners Group mailing list. To unsubscribe, send email to:  
dog-unsubscribe@lists. riverland.net.au                              
---------------------------------------------------------------------You are 
subscribed to the Dimona Owners Group mailing list.To unsubscribe, send email 
to: [email protected] 
        
        

    
    

Reply via email to