Hi All,

I thought you all may be interested in the following 

 

1.      We have finally got our replacement prop from Hoffmann (10 mths) and
was rather expensive so when I was told a forklift fork had gone thru the
box in transit my reaction was rather predictable. Fortunately it was not
damaged
2.      Before this happened, I had contact with Airmaster props here in New
Zealand.  They could produce a really nice little constant speed prop
(electrically operated) which would be a real plus for the L2000 Dimona"s.
However I got a call from the head honcho of NZ CAA airworthiness who
totally rejected the idea. (being a type certified aircraft) Hence the
Hoffmann prop.   However now the Limbach engines no longer have EASA
approval, that may change the H36 type certificate to enable  "special
Category" or even "experimental"   so if there is anybody interested in
installing an Electric Airmaster prop that will fit on an L2000 Limbach
(correct rotation) let me know as I have organised 2 blades (Made by
Sensnich).
3.      I think the cracked ferrells of the props has been caused by
excessive temperature and humidity levels in our uninsulated, shingle floor
and wet hangar over a long period of time. So I am thinking of a controlled
heated insulated blanket over the prop and engine.   Raychem Autotrace
heating cable seems a good suggestion or a slightly modified electric
blanket.
4.      Currently I have almost finished an annual inspection on H36 S/No
3667 ZK-GPH    It has been a real mission.  I found a turnbuckle fork end of
one of the thrust cables under the engine was broken .. and had been so for
a long time so was held only by lock wire. Quite strong lock wire I reckon
5.      I have ferried it around NZ for subsequent owners and the aileron
control was unacceptably stiff, to a point of "sticking" when operated.
Making it a really unpleasant little rocket to fly.

This H36 was not a Thai one, but was imported to NZ from Italy (tho German
registered  D-KEBA)  in 2010. However it does have the early "aileron push
rod in compression when both ailerons are forced upwards.  This was a design
problem which was corrected with later serial No's which had the rods in a
tension mode.  The aileron bell crank for the older Dimona's is fabricated
from tube while the later (tension) bellcranks are made up of flat plate and
there is only 3 bearing sets in the wings as opposed to 5.

 

Now for the jucy bit ..    

 We made a detailed inspection of each of the 10 bearing sets (5 per wing)
with a small camera and found some of the bearing sets (3 ball bearings
pointing inwards on a 3 piece metal "holder")  mounted on wooden mounts   ie
the control rod passed thru the bearing sets and through a hole in the
mount.  We found that some bearing sets were not installed dead centre of
the mounting bracket hole  The over all clearance being about 1 to 2 mm. 

The upward load on the ailerons of the H36 when doing say 90 Kts is REALLY
high.  And I think is underestimated. Hence the compressive load into the
pushrods is also VERY high forcing the rod to bend like a snake. Putting a
high lateral load to each bearing set.

So with misaligned bearing sets some of the bearings were not touching the
rod hence "rubbing" on the wooden bearing set mounts. So that is why the
ailerons were really stiff in flight but seemed OK on the ground   

 

To repair was a mission. We didn't want to put holes in the wing so designed
a cutter system which we made from a short length of brass   turned it down
to 18mm, put an 8mm thread in one end, rounded off the other end and drilled
a hole thru the thing used a 6mm drill cut off and a cutting edge ground so
it protruded from the brass"slug" about 3 -4 mm.    we then used an old push
rod with the "slug" on one end and a battery drill at the other and with
great care, removed the mounting bracket material as close as possible to
the metal bearing fittings.   

 

So it still needs a test  flight but problem solved.  I think Hoffmann has
issues because prior to changing the push rod configuration, there were
about 5 different variations of bearing sets in the wings.

 

If any of you want to see some pictures of the procedure let me know.

 

Our Dimona (ex Thai) bearing sets had a solid nylon outer including the
outer ball race, so we had no choice than to make big holes and replace
them.   As they all were seized  Another Ex Thai (currently being restored)
didn't have ball type bearings, just Teflon (or nylon rings)     S/no 3667
fortunately had proper bearings (ie with a metal outside ball race) and a
nylon "tyre" against the push rod.  

 

So I thought you all may be interested.   I am astounded that the aircraft
has been flying for over 40 years like this and would be interested in your
comments

 

Best regards

 

Ian Williams

Drury

Auckland

New Zealand 

Reply via email to