On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:07:36 +0100, Sean Gibbins <s...@funkygibbins.me.uk>
wrote:
I can't see where that particular 'slippery slope' is taking us, but
would be happy to acknowledge your point if you can provide an example
of where it might lead.
It gets the public accustomed to collecting evidence, dubious accuracy.
against their peers.
(At this point I would like to define a crime as something which harms
someone (very brief and there are pitfalls). Speeding does not harm
people. Driving into someone at speed may harm them. Which brings my
feelings of speed limits etc. in the fray)
It makes people accustomed, to aiding in the prosecution of their peers,
in the process of 'potential crimes'. It also makes people accustomed to
remote monitoring of their peers, by their peers. If I can monitor
you-or-you, then the police can do it just fine.
--
Robert Bronsdon
--
Next meeting: Bournemouth? TBD, Wednesday 2010-10-06 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://bit.ly/4sACa
