On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:42:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > So, I'd suggest a better way to run this is first build the kernel, > > then mine the gcc -MD output (ie stored in the .XX.cmd files) to > > generate a list of headers that are actually part of the build, then > > only test those. That eliminates all the kconfig problems. Opt out any > > special headers that really have a good reason not to be stand alone. > > I think we'd want the drm headers pass the checks independent of configs > (apart from CONFIG_DRM). One size doesn't fit all.
Why? That demand is just making it impossible to make shared infrastructure, and I don't think DRM should go off and build its own stuff just for DRM in a way that nobody else can use it. If you really, really, care then you can have your makefile codegen an "allheaders.c" that #includes drm/*.h and compile that. Jason
