> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/10] mtd: intel-dg: implement access functions
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 04:33:38PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> > Implement read(), erase() and write() functions.
>
> ...
>
> > +__maybe_unused
> > +static ssize_t idg_write(struct intel_dg_nvm *nvm, u8 region,
> > + loff_t to, size_t len, const unsigned char *buf)
> > +{
> > + size_t i;
> > + size_t len8;
> > + size_t len4;
> > + size_t to4;
> > + size_t to_shift;
> > + size_t len_s = len;
> > + ssize_t ret;
> > +
> > + idg_nvm_set_region_id(nvm, region);
> > +
> > + to4 = ALIGN_DOWN(to, sizeof(u32));
> > + to_shift = min(sizeof(u32) - ((size_t)to - to4), len);
> > + if (to - to4) {
> > + ret = idg_nvm_rewrite_partial(nvm, to4, to - to4, to_shift,
> (uint32_t *)&buf[0]);
>
> Forgot to add, you're using both uint32_t and u32.
> Perhaps make it consistent?
>
Sure, missed this
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + buf += to_shift;
> > + to += to_shift;
> > + len_s -= to_shift;
> > + }
> > +
> > + len8 = ALIGN_DOWN(len_s, sizeof(u64));
> > + for (i = 0; i < len8; i += sizeof(u64)) {
> > + u64 data;
> > +
> > + memcpy(&data, &buf[i], sizeof(u64));
> > + idg_nvm_write64(nvm, to + i, data);
> > + if (idg_nvm_error(nvm))
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + len4 = len_s - len8;
> > + if (len4 >= sizeof(u32)) {
> > + u32 data;
> > +
> > + memcpy(&data, &buf[i], sizeof(u32));
> > + idg_nvm_write32(nvm, to + i, data);
> > + if (idg_nvm_error(nvm))
> > + return -EIO;
> > + i += sizeof(u32);
> > + len4 -= sizeof(u32);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (len4 > 0) {
> > + ret = idg_nvm_rewrite_partial(nvm, to + i, 0, len4, (uint32_t
> *)&buf[i]);
>
> Ditto (and also in all other places if any).
>
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
>
> Raag
