On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 17:38, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: > > fine. Unless you tell me I also don't have access to a Windows computer > > with 500 Mb free.. :) > :) OK. I am convinced. > > > I'm not sure. I think that about 20Mb... for the sources. (I don't have > > my laptop with me so I can't give precise figures. Anyway just give a > > look in the size of XFree 4.1.0 source and binaries rpms to get a good > > ideia.) > :((( Not too small (I expected something like this). Taking that 90% of > the code is the same libs and progs as in standard XFree - does it make > sense to download 20M over 56K? > This is something that you have to decide for yourself...
> > It's possible to build the modules separately. The Redhat for instance > > does that in its kernel source. > The question was whether is possible to build modules for "any" 2.4.x > kernel. But if you use the same kernel as me - see below. > > > To answer to your 2nd question: yes. It's exactly the same distribution > > I have on my laptop... > Wow! So probably your binaries are be just good for me (if you have > installed the latest updated kernel from RH which is 2.4.9-13). If so, > could you put them somewhere?:) Even if your kernel is not exactly this, > I could give a try... (using insmod -f :) > Ok. I have no problem in doing that. Give-me a couple days and I'll give you a url. If anyone else is also interested please e-mail me privately saying so. > Cheers, > > Sergey Regards, Jose Fonseca _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
