> So possibilities are:
>  - batchbuffer starvation -- has

I was going to say 'has this changed significantly' -- and the answer
is that it has of course, with the bufmgr_fake changes...  I can't
tell by quick inspection if these are a likely culprit, but it's
certainly a signifcant set of changes relative to the classic version
of classic...

>  - over-throttling in swapbuffers -- I think we used to let it get
> two frames ahead - has this changed?
>  - something else...

Keith

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to