Keith Whitwell wrote: >> * Classic is apparently doing suboptimal syncs that limits its >> performance in some cases (gears, teapot and perhaps openarena), >> one should not benchmark framerates against classic in those cases. >> > > As I said elsewhere, I'd like to get to the bottom of this -- it > wasn't always this way. Otherwise we should abandon 'classic' off the > trunk and use one of the ye olde 7.0 versions. > > I agree.
I did some benchmarks on TTM vs classic then and they were quite similar back then with TTM generally using slightly more CPU, as we would expect. TTM of course would do better on apps with certain texture functionality due to it's single texture copy. > Keith > /Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
