On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:34:28PM +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:24:22PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > 2010/3/11 Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com>:
> > > I like keeping all the asic definitions in one file as you tend to
> > > need to update them all at one time and having them spread across all
> > > the asic files increases the likelihood of one or more of them getting
> > > missed.  But I can live with it if other folks think it's a good idea.
> > 
> > Same here. One file means easier editing. Maybe we could use some
> > other of proposed tricks?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Rafał
> 
> I don't have strong feeling but Alex has a point, right now we often
> update them, maybe we should add radeon_asic.c and move asic init
> (function now in radeon_device.c) along structure there.

Ok, convinced. I'll respin the patch series along your idea (creating
radeon_asic.c) and resend.

Yours, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to