On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:01:29PM -0800, Brian Aker wrote: > BTW on an interesting note the above number breaks the protocol. No one > assumed more then 2^8 versions would ever be needed :)
Base 256 encode the revision number? That way we still get to have a limit related to a 3 byte int :) -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
