On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Stewart Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:33:25AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: >> Baron Schwartz wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Stewart Smith <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> But this is more performance schema than information schema. >> > >> > Is it a good idea to follow MySQL's lead in separating those two? >> >> Depends. If MySQL separated them b/c of the current I_S implementation's >> performance problems, then no. If for some other reason, perhaps... > > There is a standard for I_S, so we should follow that where we can. > > In my mind, the sep is I_S is standardised while a PERF_SCHEMA or > whatever is whatever we can grab from internals that may be useful to > people. i.e. not standard at all, not data dictionary based - but rather > tied to internals.
I am probably ignorant, but as I understand it, the I_S standard specifies the common denominator and says any extensions to that are fine. Is that not the case? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
