Hi Arjen!

On Apr 27, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Arjen Lentz wrote:


Drizzle is available under a GPL license and the bzr history contains, hopefully signed, commits from non-Sun employees, thus making it impossible for any current or future owner of Sun to simply take the code and run. Which is the whole reason for the existence of the GPL.

I'm sure Sun's lawyers could clarify this, but I wouldn't bother. Without a doubt management has done all the necessary work before this project was started.


Actually, BSD licensing of new externally written contributions is exactly what would allow Sun (or whomever owns Sun) to grab (a copy of the) the codebase and also sell it under a non-GPL license. After all, BSD allows them to do so and they do own the GPL licensed bits of the code. This doesn't take anything away from the community or contributors, but it does give Sun some extra opportunity (such as, effectively, dual-licensing just like MySQL has done).


Interesting. I wasn't aware that contributions should all be under BSD. Thanks for the pointer!

cheers,
-k
--
Kay Roepke
Software Engineer, MySQL Enterprise Tools

Sun Microsystems GmbH    Sonnenallee 1, DE-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitz d. Aufs.rat.: Martin Haering                    HRB MUC 161028


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to