Hi Tom, Le vendredi 01 oct. 2010 à 10:07:50 (+0200), Tom Hendrikx a écrit : > On 01/10/10 08:50, Eric Bischoff wrote: > >> I'd be more pessimistic on this figure. The hash driver seems to be broken > >> and I do not think another release should be done while it isn't fixed. > >> > >> However, I really think this should be fixed before a new release can > >> happen. > > > > Why is it so important? Because this is the default driver for Debian, > > Ubuntu and compatible distros. That means that basically, out of the box, > > dspam does not work as it should. > > > > I think I have to disagree here. Release early, release often is imho > the best way to work. 3.9.1 has some improvements over 3.9.0, and major > improvements over 3.6.8/3.8.0.
I would normally agree with you, but in this particular case, the fact we have no more active developer working on the project makes me reluctant to have a new release for now… until someone is able to take over development. It is not a question of Debian or not. The hash driver is a supported backend, and must be fixed, whatever the default driver is in Debian, Fedora, or whatever other distribution. Cheers, Julien -- Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> http://www.kirya.net GPG key: 1024D/9F71D449 17F4 93D8 746F F011 B845 9F91 210B F2AB 9F71 D449
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
