On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:07:50 +0200, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote:
> On 01/10/10 08:50, Eric Bischoff wrote:
>>> I'd be more pessimistic on this figure. The hash driver seems to be broken
>>> and I do not think another release should be done while it isn't fixed.
>>>
>>> However, I really think this should be fixed before a new release can
>>> happen.
>>
>> Why is it so important? Because this is the default driver for Debian, 
>> Ubuntu and compatible distros. That means that basically, out of the box, 
>> dspam does not work as it should.
>>

What exactly is not working with the hash driver ?
I build 3.9.1 on debian squeeze and it works fine, so far.

Julien

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel

Reply via email to