Hi Stevan,

Any suggestions to getting the accuracy up would be great !
My user is shared,managed in the groups file for the domains used now.

nor...@t*.nl:
                TP True Positives:                   856
                TN True Negatives:                  6650
                FP False Positives:                    6
                FN False Negatives:                 2097
                SC Spam Corpusfed:                     0
                NC Nonspam Corpusfed:                  0
                TL Training Left:                      0
                SHR Spam Hit Rate                 28.99%
                HSR Ham Strike Rate:               0.09%
                PPV Positive predictive value:    99.30%
                OCA Overall Accuracy:             78.11%


On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote:

> Hallo Norman,
>
>
>
> you asked "what is wrong". Right? Nothing is wrong with your DSPAM
> installation. There are things you could do better but nothing is really,
> really wrong.
>
>
>
> Could you post the output of "dspam_stats -H <your user name here>".
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>
> Stevan Bajić
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
> norm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Stevan,
>
> Herewith enclosed my config.
>
> Kind regards,
> Norman
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> the statistic alone is not enough information for telling why your
>> accuracy is down. You need to post your dspam.conf.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>>
>> Stevan Bajić
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:29:06 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>> norm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have been running and training dspam for while now, but it is not at all
>> effective at the moment.
>> What could be wrong ?
>>
>>     SPAM messages Good messages  Since last reset 2083 missed 6 missed  856
>> caught 6558 delivered  29.126% caught 0.091% missed  Total processed by
>> filter 2097 missed 6 missed  856 caught 6559 delivered  From corpus 0 fed 0
>> fed
>>   Metric   Calculated as  Overall accuracy (since last reset) *78.017%* (SPAM
>> messages caught + Good messages delivered) / Total number of messages  Spam
>> identification (since last reset) *29.126%* (Spam catch rate only)  Spam
>> ratio (of total processed) *31.025%* Total SPAM messages (both caught &
>> missed) / Total number of message
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dspam-user mailing list
>> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Dspam-user mailing list
> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to