Ok thats not a big problem as this is not really working out.....
Which one should I use ?


On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote:

> Hallo Norman,
>
>
>
> getting higher accuracy would require to start from the beginning since the
> tokenizer you use is not that intelligent and using anything other more
> intelligent would require you to start from the beginning with the learning.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>
> Stevan Bajić
>
>  On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:18:37 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
> norm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stevan,
>
> Any suggestions to getting the accuracy up would be great !
> My user is shared,managed in the groups file for the domains used now..
>
> nor...@t*.nl:
>                 TP True Positives:                   856
>                 TN True Negatives:                  6650
>                 FP False Positives:                    6
>                 FN False Negatives:                 2097
>                 SC Spam Corpusfed:                     0
>                 NC Nonspam Corpusfed:                  0
>                 TL Training Left:                      0
>                 SHR Spam Hit Rate                 28.99%
>                 HSR Ham Strike Rate:               0.09%
>                 PPV Positive predictive value:    99.30%
>                 OCA Overall Accuracy:             78.11%
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hallo Norman,
>>
>>
>>
>> you asked "what is wrong". Right? Nothing is wrong with your DSPAM
>> installation. There are things you could do better but nothing is really,
>> really wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you post the output of "dspam_stats -H ".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>>
>> Stevan Bajić
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>> norm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Stevan,
>>
>> Herewith enclosed my config.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Norman
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the statistic alone is not enough information for telling why your
>>> accuracy is down. You need to post your dspam.conf.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kind Regards from Switzerland,
>>>
>>> Stevan Bajić
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:29:06 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart <
>>> norm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been running and training dspam for while now, but it is not at
>>> all effective at the moment.
>>> What could be wrong ?
>>>
>>>     SPAM messages Good messages  Since last reset 2083 missed 6 missed  856
>>> caught 6558 delivered  29.126% caught 0.091% missed  Total processed by
>>> filter 2097 missed 6 missed  856 caught 6559 delivered  From corpus 0
>>> fed 0 fed
>>>   Metric   Calculated as  Overall accuracy (since last reset) *78.017%* 
>>> (SPAM
>>> messages caught + Good messages delivered) / Total number of messages  Spam
>>> identification (since last reset) *29.126%* (Spam catch rate only)  Spam
>>> ratio (of total processed) *31.025%* Total SPAM messages (both caught &
>>> missed) / Total number of message
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>>> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dspam-user mailing list
>>> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dspam-user mailing list
>> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Dspam-user mailing list
> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to