Hallo Norman,
getting higher accuracy would require to start from the
beginning since the tokenizer you use is not that intelligent and using
anything other more intelligent would require you to start from the
beginning with the learning.
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan
Bajić
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:18:37 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart wrote:
Hi Stevan,
Any suggestions to getting the accuracy up would be great
!
My user is shared,managed in the groups file for the domains used
now..
nor...@t*.nl:
TP True Positives: 856
TN True Negatives: 6650
FP
False Positives: 6
FN False Negatives: 2097
SC Spam Corpusfed: 0
NC
Nonspam Corpusfed: 0
TL Training Left: 0
SHR Spam Hit Rate 28.99%
HSR
Ham Strike Rate: 0.09%
PPV Positive predictive value: 99.30%
OCA Overall
Accuracy: 78.11%
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Stevan Bajić
wrote:
Hallo Norman,
you asked "what is wrong". Right? Nothing is wrong
with your DSPAM installation. There are things you could do better but
nothing is really, really wrong.
Could you post the output of
"dspam_stats -H ".
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
On
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart wrote:
Hello
Stevan,
Herewith enclosed my config.
Kind regards,
Norman
On Fri, Jun
25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
Hello,
the statistic alone is
not enough information for telling why your accuracy is down. You need to
post your dspam.conf.
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan
Bajić
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:29:06 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart wrote:
I have been running and training dspam for while now, but it is not at
all effective at the moment.
What could be wrong ?
Since last reset
2083 missed
6 missed
856 caught
6558 delivered
29.126%
caught
0.091% missed
Total processed by filter
2097 missed
6
missed
856 caught
6559 delivered
From corpus
0 fed
0 fed
Overall accuracy (since last reset)
78.017%
(SPAM messages caught +
Good messages delivered) / Total number of messages
Spam identification
(since last reset)
29.126%
(Spam catch rate only)
Spam ratio (of
total processed)
31.025%
Total SPAM messages (both caught & missed) /
Total number of
message
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's
Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize
list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
[5]
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing
list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
[6]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
[7]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's
Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize
list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
[8]
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing
list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
[9]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user [10]
Links:
------
[1] mailto:ste...@bajic.ch
[2] mailto:norm...@gmail.com
[3]
mailto:ste...@bajic.ch
[4] mailto:norm...@gmail.com
[5]
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
[6]
mailto:Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
[7]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
[8]
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
[9]
mailto:Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
[10]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
