On 07.12.2011 21:14, Sven wrote: > Tom Hendrikx<tom<at> whyscream.net> writes: >> On a side note, I noticed DSPAM 3.10.1 made it to stable on gentoo this >> week. Cake time :) > Since both Postgres 9.1.1 and dspam 3.10.1 are stable on Gentoo now, people > will > loose mails here. At least on my boxes this issue caused mails to be swallowed > by dspam, no signs of trouble besides in the logs. > > I've opened a bug, but it appears the Gentoo devs don't take this seriously > enough to mask dspam 3.10.1 for the time being. Why masking when you can make a -r1 revision and just apply this patch here: http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=commit;h=9bc231ae79f84a973ced531356833142c4ae2766
Masking packages involves a lot Gentoo devs, while using a new revision with the patch from above can be done by the Ebuild maintainer. > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392407 If you know Gentoo devs then you know that just opening bug reports is not going to accelerate things. On the other hand.... adding a new revision of the Ebuild that includes the patch from above will sure get more attention. > On my boxes I've switched off dspam for now, hoping for a soon release of > 3.10.2. I'm too busy in December to do the VCS workaround on all my boxes. Also so eine wilde Sache ist ja so ein kleiner Patch nun auch wieder nicht. > Cheers, -sven Gruss aus Zürich Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
