On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On 30.04.2012 21:29, Chad M Stewart wrote: >> [...] >> In my model I have zero access to end user's mailboxes. Thus why I was >> thinking that training via web interface or via email would work. You're >> right a single button is easier. To get that in my scenario means I'll have >> to hire someone to write a plugin for Outlook. Then the Exchange user can >> click one button and have the message automatically forwarded off to the >> single address for fixing. I could have plugins written for other clients >> as well. Though that could be a support nightmare. >> > I consider supporting Outlook client to be a support nightmare. Every > version has it's own way when you want to access data.
AGREED!!! Scares the hell out of me too, but if I had to do it, I'd do it. Though I hope I can come up with a much more elegant solution. > > btw: Why reinventing the wheel? I know that there are open sourced .Net > code that has exactly that what you need. One such tool is SpamGrabber > -> http://www.spamgrabber.org/ > > It's not finished but for a good coder that should take a bunch of hours > to fix that and make it working. Probably a weekend job. > > >> [...] >> >> >> I agree and am using restriction classes within postfix. I have 100+ >> addresses that are inoculation caliber addresses. Those addresses have >> minimal smtp level checks enforced, so they get the maximum amount of spam. >> They are opted out of dspam. Mail to them is saved off to a directory where >> I'll have a script pickup and pass to dspam as an inoculation message for >> the global user I've defined, who is then in a merged group. > You can't teach a kid with information on what is bad and then expect > the kid to be prepared to know what is good. You need to show both side > of the medal. The good and the bad. So just feeding DSPAM with mostly > Spam mail will ruin your setup. You need Ham mail too. If you follow my > training advices from before then you will need way more Ham than Spam > because all the nice features like whitelisting and such will not cover > your back. Ham is usually way more diverse than Spam. Therefore you need > more Ham than Spam. Right. In my email account I've got 250K msgs, which is probably 95% (or greater) ham. I don't always clean out the spams that come in from lists like this. -Chad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
