On 01.05.2012 19:12, Steve Fatula wrote: >>> [...] >>> >> [...] > Definitley a waste, but, are 100% of users using outlook? Really? Must be a > company perhaps who standardized on outlook. Not me. I was not writing for me. Chad was talking about the need having the signature in the mail body because of Outlook users. If I would be a company using Outlook and using DSPAM for filtering then I for sure I would have an internal development department and would request from them to make a simple plugin that parses the header and sends the stuff to DSPAM server or another place that can process the signature and do the training. For sure I would not be happy with users forwarding mails back to the Anti-Spam filter.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user > -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
