>> Figure Outlook users can simply forward the message to the address and
> then the signature should be present in the body. Being a user preference > they > can easily change it if they desire. (Assuming I've given them an interface > to do so.) > This is where I have a problem. Forwarding whole messages for > retraining? This is a waste of system resources and of bandwidth. So you > receive that 5MB document and presentation and it gets tagged as Spam. > Now as a user I learned from my IT guy that I need to forward the > message to another address so that the filter learns in the future that > this is not Spam. So again I send 5 MB of date where in reality the > system just needs a hand full of data to do the same. Definitley a waste, but, are 100% of users using outlook? Really? Must be a company perhaps who standardized on outlook. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
