----- Original Message ----- > From: Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> > To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of > spam/non-spam > > On 01.05.2012 19:12, Steve Fatula wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> >>> [...] >> Definitley a waste, but, are 100% of users using outlook? Really? Must be a > company perhaps who standardized on outlook. > Not me. I was not writing for me. Chad was talking about the need having > the signature in the mail body because of Outlook users. If I would be a > company using Outlook and using DSPAM for filtering then I for sure I > would have an internal development department and would request from > them to make a simple plugin that parses the header and sends the stuff > to DSPAM server or another place that can process the signature and do > the training. For sure I would not be happy with users forwarding mails > back to the Anti-Spam filter. >
Agreed. I guess I am confused as to why all the outlook talk. It would be different with another email client? If you had 10 different clients? I can see the dev work if indeed it was a company who was totally outlook, but, why if there are a mix of users? How would his app help me, using (for this email address), a web based email account? Most of my other accounts use Apple Mail, how would it help them? What about smart phone clients? etc. That's why I assumed he really was all outlook. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
